# Leetcode Remove-Linked-List-Elements

#### 2022-06-15 21:50

---

##### Data structures:

#DS #linked_list

##### Difficulty:

#leetcode #coding_problem #difficulty-easy

##### Related topics:

##### Links:

- [Link to problem](https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-linked-list-elements/)
- [Additional Solutions](<https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-linked-list-elements/discuss/722528/C++-2-solutions:-With-single-pointer-+-With-double-pointers-(Easy-to-understand)/1390186>)

---

### Problem

Given the `head` of a linked list and an integer `val`, remove all the nodes of the linked list that has `Node.val == val`, and return _the new head_.

#### Examples

**Example 1:**

![](https://assets.leetcode.com/uploads/2021/03/06/removelinked-list.jpg)

```markdown
**Input:** head = [1,2,6,3,4,5,6], val = 6
**Output:** [1,2,3,4,5]
```

**Example 2:**

```markdown
**Input:** head = [], val = 1
**Output:** []
```

**Example 3:**

```markdown
**Input:** head = [7,7,7,7], val = 7
**Output:** []
```

#### Constraints

- The number of nodes in the list is in the range `[0, 104]`.
- `1 <= Node.val <= 50`
- `0 <= val <= 50`

### Thoughts

Simple linked list operations, but remember to check for special cases:

- The pointer is null

### Solution

Two pointers, O(n)

```cpp
/**
 * Definition for singly-linked list.
 * struct ListNode {
 *     int val;
 *     ListNode *next;
 *     ListNode() : val(0), next(nullptr) {}
 *     ListNode(int x) : val(x), next(nullptr) {}
 *     ListNode(int x, ListNode *next) : val(x), next(next) {}
 * };
 */
class Solution {
public:
  ListNode *removeElements(ListNode *head, int val) {
    // O(n)
    while (head != NULL && head->val == val) {
      head = head->next;
    }

    ListNode *before = NULL;
    ListNode *ptr = head;
    ListNode *tmp;

    while (ptr != NULL) {
      if (ptr->val == val) {
        if (before != NULL) {
          before->next = ptr->next;
        }

        // delete ptr and change ptr to ptr->next
        tmp = ptr->next;
        delete ptr;
        ptr = tmp;
      } else {
        before = ptr;
        ptr = ptr->next;
      }
    }
    return head;
  }
};
```

These two are taken from discussions, and they are **not** memory safe.
Recursive solution from the same guy:

```cpp
class Solution {
public:
  ListNode *removeElements(ListNode *head, int val) {
    // Base situation
    if (head == NULL)
      return NULL;
    // Change head->next by it's val (if no val found, will not be changed)
    head->next = removeElements(head->next, val);
    // Return head or head->next, depending on the val.
    // If matched val, return its next, effectively deleting the node.
    return (head->val == val) ? head->next : head;
  }
};
```

One pointer from [Discussions](<https://leetcode.com/problems/remove-linked-list-elements/discuss/722528/C++-2-solutions:-With-single-pointer-+-With-double-pointers-(Easy-to-understand)/1390186>)

```cpp
class Solution {
public:
  ListNode *removeElements(ListNode *head, int val) {
    while (head != NULL && head->val == val)
      head = head->next;

    // He checked NULL here, so he doesn't have to check in while loop
    if (head == NULL)
      return head;

    ListNode *res = head;
    while (head->next != NULL) {
      if (head->next->val == val)
        head->next = head->next->next;
      else
        head = head->next;
    }
    return res;
  }
};
```