vault backup: 2022-09-04 15:03:27

.obsidian/core-plugins.json

@@ -12,9 +12,7 @@
   "command-palette",
   "editor-status",
   "starred",
-  "markdown-importer",
   "random-note",
   "outline",
-  "word-count",
+  "word-count"
-  "file-recovery"
 ]

.obsidian/graph.json

@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@
   "repelStrength": 10,
   "linkStrength": 1,
   "linkDistance": 250,
-  "scale": 0.9328381822372834,
+  "scale": 0.7878344292720599,
   "close": true
 }

.obsidian/plugins/obsidian-git/data.json

@@ -19,6 +19,6 @@
   "refreshSourceControl": true,
   "basePath": "",
   "differentIntervalCommitAndPush": true,
-  "changedFilesInStatusBar": false,
+  "changedFilesInStatusBar": true,
   "username": ""
 }

OJ notes/pages/Leetcode Increasing-Triplet-Subsequence.md

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Leetcode Increasing-Triplet-Subsequence
+
+2022-09-04 14:23
+
+> ##### Algorithms:
+>
+> #algorithm #greedy 
+>
+> ##### Data structures:
+>
+> #DS #array 
+>
+> ##### Difficulty:
+>
+> #coding_problem #difficulty-medium
+>
+> ##### Additional tags:
+>
+> #leetcode #CS_list_need_understanding 
+>
+> ##### Revisions:
+>
+> N/A
+
+##### Links:
+
+- [Link to problem](https://leetcode.com/problems/increasing-triplet-subsequence/)
+- [Solution with explanation](https://leetcode.com/problems/increasing-triplet-subsequence/discuss/78993/Clean-and-short-with-comments-C%2B%2B)
+
+---
+
+### Problem
+
+Given an integer array `nums`, return `true` _if there exists a triple of indices_ `(i, j, k)` _such that_ `i < j < k` _and_ `nums[i] < nums[j] < nums[k]`. If no such indices exists, return `false`.
+
+#### Examples
+
+**Example 1:**
+
+**Input:** nums = [1,2,3,4,5]
+**Output:** true
+**Explanation:** Any triplet where i < j < k is valid.
+
+**Example 2:**
+
+**Input:** nums = [5,4,3,2,1]
+**Output:** false
+**Explanation:** No triplet exists.
+
+**Example 3:**
+
+**Input:** nums = [2,1,5,0,4,6]
+**Output:** true
+**Explanation:** The triplet (3, 4, 5) is valid because nums[3] == 0 < nums[4] == 4 < nums[5] == 6.
+
+#### Constraints
+
+-   `1 <= nums.length <= 5 * 105`
+-   `-231 <= nums[i] <= 231 - 1`
+
+### Thoughts
+
+> [!summary]
+> This is a #greedy problem.
+
+Use two variables: `small` and `big` to keep track of stuff.
+
+For each element, there are three possibilities:
+
+- the element is smaller than `small`, assign the element 
+	to  `small`
+
+> `small` and `big` doesn't represent `i` and `j`, 
+> accurately, they get updated lazily.
+> And because we don't need to show `i`, `j`, `k`, this
+>  will be just fine
+
+- the element is greater than `small`:
+	- the element is smaller than `big`, change `big`, this 
+		  allows more possibilities
+	- the element is bigger than `big`, found, exit loop.
+
+> #### Why not #stack ?
+> 
+> Similar to [[Leetcode Next-Greater-Element-I]], the property
+> of stack can be used for **continuity** related problem, but
+> here we don't need this.
+
+### Solution
+
+```cpp
+class Solution {
+public:
+  bool increasingTriplet(vector<int> &nums) {
+    // greedy algorithm
+    int small = INT_MAX, big = INT_MAX;
+
+    for (int i = 0, size = nums.size(); i < size; i++) {
+      if (nums[i] <= small) {
+        // Use equal sign here, to avoid small and big being same.
+        small = nums[i];
+      } else if (nums[i] <= big) {
+        // Use equal sign here, to avoid three consecutive
+        // same numbers
+        big = nums[i];
+      } else {
+        return true;
+      }
+    }
+
+    return false;
+  }
+};
+```

OJ notes/pages/Leetcode Non-Overlapping-Intervals.md

@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@
 
 > ##### Algorithms:
 >
-> #algorithm #greedy 
+> #algorithm #greedy
 >
 > ##### Data structures:
 >
-> #DS
+> #DS #array 
 >
 > ##### Difficulty:
 >
-> #coding_problem #difficulty-medium 
+> #coding_problem #difficulty-medium
 >
 > ##### Additional tags:
 >
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ Given an array of intervals `intervals` where `intervals[i] = [starti, endi]`, r
 
 #### Constraints
 
--   `1 <= intervals.length <= 105`
+- `1 <= intervals.length <= 105`
--   `intervals[i].length == 2`
+- `intervals[i].length == 2`
--   `-5 * 104 <= starti < endi <= 5 * 104`
+- `-5 * 104 <= starti < endi <= 5 * 104`
 
 ### Thoughts
 
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ first sort the intervals.
 pick the intervals with smallest end, which will allow us to
 make more room for following ones.
 
-#tip: Use `&` to reference vectors in comp.function to save 
+#tip: Use `&` to reference vectors in comp.function to save
 time.
 
 ### Solution
@@ -100,3 +100,4 @@ public:
     return ans;
   }
 };
+```

OJ notes/pages/Leetcode Search-A-2D-Matrix-II.md

@@ -57,13 +57,13 @@ Write an efficient algorithm that searches for a value `target` in an `m x n` in
 
 #### Constraints
 
--   `m == matrix.length`
+- `m == matrix.length`
--   `n == matrix[i].length`
+- `n == matrix[i].length`
--   `1 <= n, m <= 300`
+- `1 <= n, m <= 300`
--   `-109 <= matrix[i][j] <= 109`
+- `-109 <= matrix[i][j] <= 109`
--   All the integers in each row are **sorted** in ascending order.
+- All the integers in each row are **sorted** in ascending order.
--   All the integers in each column are **sorted** in ascending order.
+- All the integers in each column are **sorted** in ascending order.
--   `-109 <= target <= 109`
+- `-109 <= target <= 109`
 
 ### Thoughts
 
@@ -99,4 +99,4 @@ public:
     return false;
   }
 };
-```
+```

_tools/prettify.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+#/bin/sh
+
+find . -type f -iname "*.md" | xargs -0 -d "\n" prettier -w